Our Brain’s Negative Bias/ Why Our Brains Are More Highly To Capture Negative Events

Brains prejudicial notion process and invalidatingness refers to those make upts that atomic number 18 not rehabilitative and negate our feelings and desires. Conniffs brains on negativity stresses that even with all irrefutable things in life, one cast out thought or event generates the focus of attendance of a individual. According to him chores ar in a way part of our life. Only enigmas study to success. Because problems crave our way to find solutions and last new opportunities in life atomic number 18 established. Until and unless thither will be no problem, no one will eer go to work or essay for better.Hence, our brain has the capability to approach for the solutions in a overbearing way by validating opinion. Positive bring forwarding makes a person courageous and strong full to face hardships in life. Positive composition generates new ideas to work on and resist one from withdrawal. With every new problem and hardship every person faces well-n igh kind of mix attitude and behavior. close to detrimental feelings are produced that discourages a person and insist on withdrawal. Simultaneously confirming thinking encourages us to overcome the problem and find new solutions to tackle it and think of better.Positive thinking approaches part disallow thinking evokes withdrawal. However, both the systems are distinctly screen and operate independently. Smith et al (2003) present that negative stimuli stop more attention of the individual than plus stimuli. They vizord PI component of ERP (event related brain potential) as an index for measuring attention allocated to grouchy stimuli. They investigate how the event is processed and how the commanding and negative information is differentiated. Positive and negative stimuli evoke attention differentially. Negative stimuli grab attention more than positive stimuli.Certain negative stimuli capture attention more than negative stimuli which elicit lesser response. This q uery confirms the idea of confinns that negative stimuli evoke stronger response. Researchers measure electric responses. Paul Rozin and Edward Royzman in their research Negative stimuli, Negative dominance and transmission hypothesize that all animals and humans circulate greater attention to negative and imminent event and stimulus as compared to positive one. According to Peeters et al (1989) the reason that negative stimuli grasp more attention is their unparalleled and sudden lapserence.As positive stimuli are presumed to be natural and everyone is adapted to their occurrence, hence no one is shocked when they occur. But negative stimuli are rarified one and it is usually unnatural and unrealistic to rent it and no one wants or assumes it to happen, but when it does it creates shock, anger and fear. The negative bias and negative events are more dominant and prevalent as compared to positive ones. Secondly they postulate that there is no jeerncy in positive stimuli an d their frequent occurrence makes us accommodative to it.But negative stimuli are very rare and sometimes, dangerous and alarming, that requires urgent reaction to it. negativism always contaminates positivism. Like even let down-ranking measuring rod of pollution can easy contaminate large area of subtle atmosphere. Some negative stimuli are gruelling and create fear that produce an urge a need for defense and escape valve from that purlieu. Paul Rozin describes three different nervous systems designed to escape from danger. The three spooky systems are at different levels of commutation nervous system.One is at the level of spinal cord, at limbic system and at the level of cortex. The reflex mechanism at the level of spinal cord allow the person withdraw immediately from achy stimulus like touching a hot stove. The person immediately withdrew reach out from the stove without giving it a thought and before the stimulus reaches the cortex. Rozin purposes that always macrocosm playful and happy may neer let us progress in life and look for new opportunities. He also proposes that positive reactions are sole(prenominal) short lived while negative actions micturate long lasting effects.Even men who have done something wrong their outcomes last even after they die. Further, the effects of negativity are much stronger that even small measuring stick of negative stimuli can destroy positive effects. The example he quoted is that small amount of tar can ruin a whole brake drum of beloved while a small amount of honey can do nothing to the barrel of tar. Thus, the negative stimuli are much stronger and potent. The chapter 3 in Conniffs book and the rest two articles are in pact with each other support the idea of negativity having more influence than positive events.I agree with conniffs idea more or less negativity bias because in our daylight to day observation we can face that negative events affect our emotions more powerfully than do positive events. One more thing that I can suggest is that negative stimuli evoke stronger response when they occur low gear time in a sudden. However, the alike(p) negative event or stimulus occurring repeatedly can lower the response generated as humans and animals become adaptive to it and gradually they change their environment or behavior in a way to either avoid it or become accommodated with it.Hence, negative stimuli occurring over again and again may not produce same response as that was produced at first time. References Coniff, Richard (2005). The Ape In The Corner Office. Chapter 3 (pp. -33-39). N. Kyle Smitha